The world has become increasingly aware of the challenges facing Australia’s big three banks: the banks, the insurers, and the insurance regulators.
While the major banks are working on a fusion, their competitors are still struggling to catch up.
The question is: how do we get the big three to come together to solve the challenge?
That’s what Peter Whelan from the Bank of Western Australia’s Centre for Financial Stability and Innovation has been working on for the past three years.
Mr Whelann said that in the past, big banks had been able to rely on the insurance industry to help them navigate regulatory issues.
“The insurance industry, for example, has been very helpful, but we’re now seeing a real challenge with regulators,” he said.
“When the big banks first started to invest in this area, they had a lot of experience and a lot to learn.”
But now we are seeing the industry start to recognise that they need to get together and work together to do something about the problem.
“What he is proposing is a fusion between the big two banks that will see the big four banks work with the big five insurance regulators to get a more holistic understanding of the risks that are being posed to the system.
The idea is that by collaborating, the big seven will have more leverage in managing risk, Mr Whamann said.
In fact, a major part of the proposed fusion will be to work with insurance regulators and regulators of the other big four insurers.
The big four will work together with the insurance companies, which would allow the big insurers to provide risk assessments and other information to the regulators.
The fusion will have a range of benefits for the banks and insurers, Mr Crouch said.
It would reduce the time that regulators spend dealing with complex issues that are often outside the jurisdiction of the insurance regulator, he said, and could reduce the cost of dealing with those issues.
The banks would have access to more information on the industry, the regulators and other regulatory bodies, allowing them to respond more effectively to risks.
Insurance regulators could also be more able to manage the risks posed by the fusion.
They would be able to use their regulatory powers to make sure that their policies and practices are tailored to the needs of the big banking industry, he added.
“So we could use that information to work more effectively.” “
We’ve got a lot more information now about the risks of these products and the risks we’re taking from the banks,” he told ABC News.
“So we could use that information to work more effectively.”
What the banks have been saying, however, is that they are reluctant to get their heads around fusion because it would involve putting a lot on the banks’ shoulders.
“If we’re putting all our eggs in one basket, we’ll have a very hard time managing all these risks,” Mr Wley said.
While fusion is not an easy solution for banks, Mr Golledge said the biggest risk to them was that it would have to wait until regulators have worked through all of the problems posed by fusion.
“Fusion is a huge investment and a huge risk for our banks and our insurance industry,” he added, warning that it could take decades to develop the fusion needed.
“It would be quite expensive, it would be a huge undertaking and the banks are not yet comfortable with that.”
What do you think?
Should the banks merge?
Let us know in the comments below.
The ABC’s Paul Waugh, who is also a member of the Banking and Finance committee, is also an adviser to the Australian Financial Reform Commission, which is a government-funded body charged with reviewing the state of Australia’s financial sector.
The panel has recommended that the banks be allowed to merge.
The report also recommended that Australia introduce a national benchmark for the size of the banking sector, with a limit of 50 per cent of banks’ total assets.
The Financial Services Commission is also considering a similar proposal.